I have just finished looking through the paper titled ” a vision based forced landing site selection system for an autonomous UAV”, and here is the comments I had made for this paper.
First, this paper defined the necessity of the forced/emergent landing site selection for an autonomous UAV. Although through GPS and existing map or GIS database it is would be possible for UAV to find a landing space, however it would be greatly restricted if there is no further information about some moving objects on the surface of landing site, or failed functioning when in disaster situation or some places without GIS data. The best solution is to mimic the man driving procedure, and find the landing site using camera mounted on the UAV.
Second, this paper provied a framework for finding the landing site using the video data, which has the layered structure. It also put forward the functions of the first 4 layers of this framework, allowing adding other function layers to this framework without changing too much the whole system. Its working principle is from coarse to fine, that is: using line/edge recognition algorithms to quickly find the places which are possible suitable for landing, and then on layer 2 to determine the surface type of each cadidate landing site; the third layer is the slope augmentation so that the unsuitable landing sites will be rejected, and the 4th layer is the dangerous landing site identification. Finally, through all the layers, there will be a fusion mechanism to determine the best landing site for the UAV.
Third, the paper gave the configuation of the experiment rig and also, the testing results. The paper has done a good job according to the experiement data and figures, but no further information has been provided by this paper, and may need to do the same experiment again to see if it is really useful.
Last, the paper prived some suggestions on how to identify the surface type of the candidate landing sites. It listed many references, and would be helpful if i want to do the same job.